Fastest on the water but a slight touch puts them 2nd! Well deserved result Tim/ET Well done the rest of the Squad so far too
All results here:-
http://www.ausopen.canoe.org.au/default ... s/20918/0/
2011 Australian Open - Penrith
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 11:21 pm
- Location: Cheshire
-
- Posts: 1480
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 8:31 am
- Location: Peterborough
- Contact:
Congratulations to Tim/ET and to Campbell who went WON better!
Kendall, not sure what your question means, so cant offer a biased opinion.
Kendall, not sure what your question means, so cant offer a biased opinion.
All spelling errors are intentional and are there to show new and improved ways of spelling old words. Grammatical errors are due to too many English classes/teachers.
Old. Fat. Slow. Bad tempered. And those are my good points
Old. Fat. Slow. Bad tempered. And those are my good points
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 11:21 pm
- Location: Cheshire
CP,
It's really a research question. It appears that we have more Female K1's in the top echelon than we do Male. If this is the case why? Are training methods different for K1M than they are for K1W. I refuse to accept any suggestion that we are less capable than other countries, so what is it that creates the difference. I am not a statistician, so it may be that K!M and K!W statistically rank the same ( see statistical vocabulary is not even there), but there does seem to be a difference. (If there is no difference then I am more of an idiot than I thought.)
The question is not designed to be offensive. I think we have a real world class team but there is a glitch. Is there a difference between our own training methods and those of other countries? I don't know where the answers lie, but perhaps there is a cause to compare training methods.
It's really a research question. It appears that we have more Female K1's in the top echelon than we do Male. If this is the case why? Are training methods different for K1M than they are for K1W. I refuse to accept any suggestion that we are less capable than other countries, so what is it that creates the difference. I am not a statistician, so it may be that K!M and K!W statistically rank the same ( see statistical vocabulary is not even there), but there does seem to be a difference. (If there is no difference then I am more of an idiot than I thought.)
The question is not designed to be offensive. I think we have a real world class team but there is a glitch. Is there a difference between our own training methods and those of other countries? I don't know where the answers lie, but perhaps there is a cause to compare training methods.
-
- Posts: 1480
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 8:31 am
- Location: Peterborough
- Contact:
Oh no, a serious question that will need some thinking....hopefully someone will step in before I have to do any thinking!
All spelling errors are intentional and are there to show new and improved ways of spelling old words. Grammatical errors are due to too many English classes/teachers.
Old. Fat. Slow. Bad tempered. And those are my good points
Old. Fat. Slow. Bad tempered. And those are my good points